Answered

Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

HELP!!!! GEOMETRY! I AM CONFUSED WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF YOU HAVE EXPLANATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE THANKS IN ADVANCEE!!!! IF YOU HELP YOU"RE THE BESTTT

is this statement valid or invalid "if an animal has feathers, than it is a bird. a crow has feathers, so it is a bird"

Sagot :

ameliaswan

Answer:

the statement is valid!

Step-by-step explanation:

first, let's consider the first statement "if an animal has feathers, then it is a bird"

well, let's think about this: are there any animals that have feathers that AREN'T birds? No!

so we know the first statement is true so it is valid

now, let's consider the second statement "a crow has feathers, so it is a bird"

is that true? well based on the first statement, if an animal has feathers it's a bird. so yes! the statement is valid

Answer: The statement is valid.

======================================================

Explanation:

This is valid by the law of detachment. This is also known as "modus ponens".

The basic format is that we have these two premises

  1. If P is true, then Q is true
  2. P is true

Those two premises work together to conclude that Q must be true. Think of it like a set of dominoes. The first domino that you knock over is statement P, which then leads to domino Q being knocked over afterward (ie statement Q must be true because P is true).

Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.