Answered

Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Farmers have long used aquifers as a source of groundwater for irrigation, but when water is conserved, they have to dig even deeper into the Earth to extract the water they need. Which argument do you believe that farmers will face using this process?

Argument 2: This is an affordable process and it can have a huge impact on the agriculture industry.
Argument 3: Groundwater is a valuable resource in the United States only and farmers will not have a problem with needing water for their crops.
Argument 4: Groundwater is a valuable resource in the United States and throughout the world, but farmers have an unlimited supply.
Argument 1: This is a costly process and it can have a huge impact on the agriculture industry.

Sagot :

foxtrotdelta72

Answer:

Argument 1.

Step-by-step explanation: This is not cheap, and if becomes impossible or to costly, the farm industry will collapse. food shortages sure will follow.

Answer:

I believe it's argument 2.

Explanation:

Farmers don't have to pay to dig for water.

Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.