Answered

Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding precise answers from a network of experienced professionals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence immediately after sentence 6. His argument was based on the assumption that the Brontosaurus’s five sacrum bones would have fused together into the Apatosaurus’s three sacrum bones with age. Should the writer make this addition?

A. Yes, because the sentence provides compelling evidence to support the claim that Othniel Charles Marsh found two different dinosaurs.
B. Yes, because the sentence provides commentary that helps develop the paragraph’s explanation on how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified.
C. Yes, because the sentence provides useful scientific research on how bones commonly fuse together over time.
D. No, because the sentence contradicts the more recent findings by Tschopp’s team, discussed in the next paragraph.
E. No, because the sentence fails to explain why the Apatosaurus got to keep its name while the Brontosaurus did not.

Sagot :

Fahbreze

Answer:

Its B Yes, because the sentence provides commentary that helps develop the paragraph’s explanation on how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified. 100% correct

Explanation:

The sentence develops the reasoning of the paragraph by providing commentary that helps develop the explanation of how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified through Riggs’s assumption and subsequent argument. Without the sentence, the paragraph does not comment on how and why Riggs made the argument. Thus, adding the sentence to this paragraph allows the writer to explain how the argument Riggs made contributed to the Brontosaurus’s misclassification.

ProfChris1

The writer should consider adding the information.

The correct answer is

B. Yes, because the sentence provides commentary that helps develop the paragraph’s explanation on how the Brontosaurus came to be misclassified.

Looking at the sentence, we can discover that it actually provides commentary that helps in the development of the explanation.

It helps to develop the explanation of how Brontosaurus came to be misclassified.

This misclassification was due to Riggs's assumption and subsequent argument.

Thus, adding the sentence will enable the writer to further explain his argument on the misclassification of Brontosaurus.

Lean more about Brontosaurus on https://brainly.com/question/19810621

We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.