Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts on our user-friendly platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Answer:
we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the jeep has an incorrect manufacturer's MPG rating
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given;
Population mean; μ = 31.2
Sample mean; x¯ = 31.4
Sample size; n = 230
standard deviation; σ = 2.5
Significance level = 0.05
Let's define the hypotheses;
Null hypothesis; H0: μ = 31.2
Alternative hypothesis; Ha: μ ≠ 31.2
Formula for the test statistic is;
z = (x¯ - μ)/(σ/√n)
z = (31.4 - 31.2)/(2.5/√230)
z = 0.2/0.4564
z = 0.44
From online p-value from z-score calculator attached and using;
z = 0.44; two tailed hypothesis; significance value = 0.05
We have;
P-value = 0.659937
This p-value is greater than the significance value and thus, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the jeep has an incorrect manufacturer's MPG rating

We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.