Answered

Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Brenda backbiter hires frank forthright to file a defamation suit against her ex-best friend, sally sensitive, and to "spare no expense" in winning. after sally’s attorney has filed the answer to the complaint, brenda instructs frank to have a private detective assigned to case. frank hires "pink pete’s licensed investigative services, inc." pete is paid to strike up a conversation with sally at a local bar without letting her know that he has been hired by forthright’s firm. sally consumes a large amount of alcohol, complements of pete’s expense account, and admits that the defamatory statements were untrue and completely unfounded. In obtaining the admission from sally, has frank forthright acted unethically? What ethical rule has been violated?

Sagot :

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.