Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

Question 36 (Mandatory) (2 points)
Suppose a state passed a law that gave state residents preference over nonresidents
in obtaining work in that state. This law would violate the
Constitution.
a) privileges and immunities
b) interstate commerce
c) full faith and credit
d) necessary and proper
clause of the

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The law would violate the privileges and immunities clause of the Constitution by discriminating against out-of-state residents


Explanation:

The law would violate the privileges and immunities clause of the Constitution (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1). This clause prohibits states from discriminating against out-of-staters by denying them guarantees such as access to courts, legal protection, property rights, and travel rights. For instance, if a state passed a law giving preference to state residents over nonresidents in obtaining work, it would contradict this constitutional provision.


Learn more about Constitutional provisions regarding state-to-state relations here:

https://brainly.com/question/11230568


We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.