Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

The police were convinced that Melinda robbed the BANK. They arrested her, read her Miranda rights, and held her for questioning for 60 hours. Although she repeatedly asked for an attorney, the police would not allow her to contact one. She was kept awake during the entire 60 hours, not given water when she asked for it, and denied bathroom privileges. Finally, exhausted and near hysteria, she confessed to the BANK robbery. She provided details that only the bank robber could know, and it was clear she was guilty. Melinda's confession is

a. Inadmissible because the confession was elicited in direct violation of Melinda's 5th Amendment rights.
b. Inadmissible because Melinda had not been given her Miranda warnings.
c. ADMISSIBLE because Melinda was, in fact, guilty of the crime.
d. Admissible because Melinda ultimately gave information which only the ebank robber could know.


Sagot :

We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.