Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Join our Q&A platform and connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions in various areas. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

While the agents were present at 313 N.E. Brook, Joe, a neighbor, came over to direct the agents to a shed on Joe's property that he had permitted the 313 people to use. The agents searched that shed finding marijuana. The crime lab compared known fingerprints of the 313 people to those found on the marijuana wrappings. The fingerprints matched. Should a judge allow the marijuana and the fingerprint evidence.
a. No, because the agents did not obtain a search warrant to search Joe's shed.
b. No, because the evidence found in the shed was tainted by the search from the house at 313.
c. Yes, because the evidence in the shed was a result of the search at 313.
d. Yes, because the evidence in the shed was obtained from a consent search separate from the search of 313.


Sagot :

Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.